Maybe we are useful after all. Part 2

 Given the disposability of humans and all other living creatures, the Earth's world fits quite nicely into a hypothesis of a massive simulation for solving odd social problems. As if, you know, someone has thrown a large pile of play dough, which can be moulded into any weird pile, like a cat or a human. And that play dough must try to preserve its shape for as long as possible. I guess we can call it a law of physics, i.e. reducing the energy by keeping itself in a pile.

The interesting thing is: everything tends to a remarkable uniformity of shape. Look at fruits or leaves or animals. I guess the building of shapes starts somewhere on the atomic level and then proceeds with modifications to sustain the weather. The very perplexing thing is that apart of the size, life on other planets may have quite a lot of similarity with the shapes here on Earth. Makes it kinda boring, really. There must be some 4,5,6-dimensional beings to make existence bearable.

Coincidences

 Incredible coincidence tend to have incredible frequency of happening

Life of an Ordinary Writer

 I write a lot. I mean, people pay me to write different stuff. Usually on different professional and technical topics. My main observation from this occupation: there are always those people claimed to be 'Big Thinkers' who write something extremely vague about planes, concepts perpendicularly related to concepts, meta-designs, and other 'stuff' that they think must be relevant but actually is so vague and boundless that anything can be included or excluded. They write and the public says 'oh!' and 'ah!' and generally admire.

Then more practical people come to me and ask me to explain what has actually happened because in reality no one has understood planes and concepts, stuff, and conceptual meta-design. And once I explain and relate to practical things, turns out that half of the time the big thinkers have just described what everyone was already doing. And there's no argument they were right because just about anything can fit in or fit out depending on who's interpreting.

And yeah, some 'Big Thinkers' write very attractively and it is a pleasure to read. But quite often the Big Thoughts are also very shallow and under the 'Big' title, there's a utopian promise resting on more unrealistic conditions than there's stars in the sky. And, let's be honest, the dumbrunner said it best:

https://dumbrunner.com/motivation-news/2019/12/11/dumb-runner-poster-187

Life in Circles

Interesting thing happened today. 

I have a ton of Facebook friends whom I mostly know and I few whom I don't really know. And yeah, I always try to remove them, but I guess there are moments when I am not myself (I am Mary Ann as well, like Alice in Wonderland) and these strangers reappear. 

Well, this year I was nice and listened to everyone who have sent me a Happy Birthday. They were numerous. Not so bad after all. Anyway, certain A has sent me a message. I said thank you. A week later he said "Pleasure, sorry for late reply". Late reply? - did we ever talk?? - thought I. Turns out we covered something like a year with nearly daily conversations while traveling through different countries and cities. I had no idea.

Conclusion - I'm not rude. I just don't remember that we were friends one day.

And yeah - damn - I'm writing another Master's report that makes me want to just finish it and forget about it. I am tired and dreaming of attending some lecture so that I don't have to think for 1,5 hours :) Trying to change anything in life is hopeless. I'm gonna stop.

How to Entertain the Nation one Catastrophe at a Time

The only potentially interesting thing these days is that I've read that NASA is starting to create panic (yes, the politically correct expression is "caution", please replace according to your language sensitivity) linked to the potential of meteorites destroying habitable land to the size of an average US state [1]. 

[2]

So, I guess after we'd enough of pandemics (I'm literally dying from boredom), we'll get into the mode of avoiding Space danger (because astronomers also need to make money, biotechs are fine now - thank you to all who made contributions, due to fear or other more pragmatic reasons). But I guess it might take another 10 years to get to that new thing (sigh).

In 2000s we had terrorism, in 2010, we had market crash, now pandemic, 2030 might be a space attack.

(to give you more of history: 1990s were Iron Curtain collapse, 1970s - oil crises, in 1980 I was born, so I skip that one as an obvious event of the century; and before 1970 my memory of the history is not sufficient 😊).

And by the way, I'm gonna help NASA (as a good citizen):

"[a 20 m asteroid] has a .41% chance of hitting Earth. That means there is a 1 in 240 chance that it will make an impact or a 99.95% chance that it will miss Earth." [3].

Notice that's more than risk of dying from COVID (not that it's a fair comparison, for many reasons, don't ask...).

References:

[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/30/threat-to-earth-posed-by-meteors-must-be-taken-seriously-nasa-warns.html

[2] https://media-pi.fr/agora-pi/le-poing-de-feu/

[3] https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2020/08/21/is-earth-really-in-danger-of-an-asteroid-impact-in-november-heres-what-we-know/

SC: Tout a commencé un beau jour

Je viens d'obtenir mon doctorat et je ne savais pas trop quoi faire. Je n'avais pas besoin de travailler, alors j'ai pu choisir. Cependant, j'ai hésité. Rempli de ces pensées, j'ai écrit à mon ami L. : "Je n'arrive pas à décider ce que je veux faire. Ou plutôt, dans quel ordre j'aimerais faire les choses. C'est vraiment gênant pour les gens de vivre de manière séquentielle - je pense que j'aime toutes les périodes de la vie, mais il serait beaucoup plus amusant de les mélanger, par exemple : aller à l'école pendant un mois, prendre sa retraite ensuite pendant un mois, se marier pendant un mois, avoir des enfants pendant un mois, et aller refaire tout cela, mais dans un ordre différent. ". Et L. répondit : "Fais-le". 

 Et je l'ai fait. Bien sûr, ce n'était pas une affaire d'un jour. J'ai planifié, expérimenté, échoué, encore et encore. J'ai étudié la physique quantique et la biologie, puis j'ai échoué encore plus parce que j'avais besoin de sources d'énergie économiques et renouvelables. J'ai étudié la physique des planètes et des étoiles. Finalement, la technologie était prête. 

L'idée principale était simple.Je créerai des copies de l'univers chaque fois que je sauterais dans une autre ligne d'espace-temps. Contrairement à la croyance conventionnelle, les copies s'unissent au bout d'un certain temps, et les souvenirs des personnes qui se trouvent dans les copies unies se mélangent pour créer une version bien adaptée à la majorité. Ainsi, chaque fois que je laisserai une copie, celle-ci gravitera vers la copie la plus proche pour se réunir. Et moi, en fait, je n'existerai que dans ma propre mémoire. 

Et je me suis préparée pour mon long voyage en écoutant la chanson: 

Nous on fait l'amour on vit la vie 
Jour après jour nuit après nuit
À quoi ça sert d'être sur la terre 
Si c'est pour faire nos vies à genoux
On sait que le temps c'est comme le vent 
De vivre y'a que ça d'important 
On se fout pas mal de la morale 
On sait bien qu'on fait pas de mal

Exactement: "À quoi ça sert d'être" si ce n'est de faire ce qu'on veut?

This is how my Canadian story started:

(Shhhh...I just wanted to own a Canadian, don't tell anyone)

"In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance.

The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, written by a US man, and posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:

Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law.

I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can.

When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination ... End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offence.

4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?

7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help.

Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your adoring fan.

James M. Kauffman, Ed.D. Professor Emeritus,

Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education

University of Virginia

PS (It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian)"

I AM NOT THE AUTHOR and I'm not sure if Prof. Kauffman is BUT I LOVE IT

Sans consequances

Je suis dans le laboratoire. Du sang dans une boîte, des virus dans le congélateur, l'ordinateur qui traite les données. Les dernières minutes avant le coucher du soleil. Il est temps de rentrer à la maison. Je jette un dernier coup d'oeil à l'écran et, à ma grande surprise, les graphiques sont prêts. Je m'assois encore une fois. Ça a marché ? Le taux de détection est de 95%, l'écart type de 5%. Aussi bon que possible. Mon équipe va finir le reste. Je m'en vais.

Plus de raison de rentrer "chez moi", cet endroit que j'appelais chez moi n'est qu'une minute dans le continuum espace-temps de ma vie. Je quitte le bâtiment de la biotechnologie. Où est-ce que je veux aller ? Les possibilités sont illimitées, mais je continue à marcher devant. Il commence à pleuvoir. Je sens la pluie sur mes joues. Ou est-ce des larmes ? J'ai fait tout ce que je voulais dans cette vie, j'ai créé de la vie, des machines, des idées... et j'ai laissé le mérite aux autres. La pluie laissera le sol nourri, quelque part dans les éléments qui atteignent le sol seront mes larmes. Ma vie est...ma vie n'était que des larmes dans la pluie...

Chapitre 2. Tout a commencé un beau jour

...à suivre

La vie en roses..;)

Parfois, la chose qui nous donne l'espoir n'est qu'une rose, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry avait raison, comme toujours:

Je dors sur des roses
Qui signent ma croix
La douleur s'impose
mais je n'ose pas
Effleurer les choses
Écloses sans toi
Oh! ma rose
Ne fane pas
je manque de toi
Dans mes nuits
Dans la pluie
Dans les rires
Dans le pire
De ma vie

(par quelqu'un autre)

It's Good to be Mad

[2016-04-27] Let's be honest, I wrote this more than 4 years ago and now I don't remember why and in what context. But evidence shows that over the past 4 years, I've done everything I could to eliminate any hint of normality in my life. Now, I'm fully ready to meet Zaphod Beeblebrox (or an alternative, I'm as un-picky as Trillian) and leave the boundaries of the solar system...